Responsibility of Social Media Platforms – Jammu Kashmir Latest News | Tourism
Anything that works without a code, a set of guidelines and certain regulations means a vulnerability to misguidance and therefore no liability and perhaps also a chance on the ground for unwanted and criminal elements to operate. As a natural corollary, therefore, to omissions, commissions and lying, there is ambiguity in dealing with the consequences, if not absolute implied immunity from the law. Information technologies and the digital world are in fact intended to achieve the goals of the fastest communication, to exchange the latest news in the world of education, technology and the like through various modes of media platforms social. Internet-based social media, as is, enables instant electronic communication of content including photos, videos, personal information, documents, etc. that users receive through computers, smartphones, tablets, etc. However, the system is very prone to abuse, abuse and causing untold damage to individuals, societies and even the country.
So should social media platforms be forced to provide and ensure greater transparency around their algorithms? Should their policies and programs be subjected to a clean and responsible image? Again, should such social media platforms be held very responsible for spreading false, misleading, damaging and provocative information or for partially or fully amplifying their content for questionable purposes? The other related question concerns the protection of personal data and its importance simply for the reason, in common parlance, that people who engage online continue to have confidence that their personal data will not be misused. but only treated with care. It may only be because of the abuse, exploitation and even blackmail of social media and privacy in many cases that the government finally considered making an opinion / un report / recommendations on these issues by a parliamentary committee for reforms and suggest a regulatory mechanism.
Criminals have lately taken to the area of access to personal data to defraud and even intimidate, harass and deceive users. Even when personal activities are monitored and tracked by unauthorized and criminal elements, it restricts their ability to express themselves freely and defeats the purpose of the digital world. However, with the main focus being on the discipline of social media platforms and the securing of personal and non-personal data, a report, having already been tabled by the parliamentary committee in both chambers of Parliament, gave its conclusions on the how, through legislation, data protection could be made more comprehensive.
In other words, the protection of not only personal but non-personal data could be made probable by making social media platforms aware of their various obligations to society and the country so that greater accountability can be sought from them. . That these platforms as well as the intermediaries are treated for this purpose as publishers, is a step towards the awareness of the sensitivities linked to these platforms. Publishers, per se, have a lot of rights, including those related to publication, copyright, advertising, etc. So if some sort of regulatory authority were to be there to control content that was detrimental to the interests of individuals, groups, societies or others – for that, it is really a valuable recommendation that a regulatory authority. regulation with statutory support should be implemented in the countryside.
What needs to be highlighted is how, especially social media platforms – those who are used to crossing established and cautious lines might be subject to more stringent scrutiny and regulation, as these platforms – Irresponsible forms, as they sometimes prove, tend to spread unfounded, false and provocative content that can even create public order problems. For this, even manufacturers of hardware and related equipment must be subject to regulatory coverage and the issuance of certificates for digital and Internet of Things. Until such legislation is passed and laws are passed, the status quo ante cannot be allowed to reign by crossing the lines “restricted” by social media platforms. to these platforms to discipline them properly.